Pharma AI Compliance

Get the signal before
inspection finds the noise

GxP Signal is the pharma intelligence layer that makes any AI gateway inspection-ready, quality-validated, and regulatory-compliant. It plugs into your existing stack — no rip-and-replace.


55%
Cost savings from risk-tiered routing
91.4%
Classification accuracy on 500 pharma prompts
32
Audit fields per record, mapped to Part 11
2025
EU AI Act enforcement begins

Your AI gateway doesn't speak pharma

Generic gateways treat a regulatory submission draft the same as an internal meeting summary. The FDA, EMA, and EU AI Act don't. Neither should your infrastructure.

01

Blind cost waste

Every task routes through premium models as a safety default. Literature screening gets the same model as an NDA submission — 55% overspend on tasks that don't require it.

Impact: $500K–$2M/yr wasted at scale
02

Invisible compliance gaps

Generic audit logs don't capture task classification, risk tier, or quality validation. When the inspector asks which model generated an output, the answer is silence.

21 CFR Part 11 · EU Annex 11 · EU AI Act Article 12
03

No domain quality gates

Does the output reference the correct ICH guideline? Is the MedDRA terminology valid? Are there unsupported efficacy claims? Generic tools can't check what they don't understand.

EU AI Act Article 9: Risk management required

Plugs into your existing stack

GxP Signal sits alongside your AI gateway. It adds the pharma intelligence layer. Your gateway handles routing. We handle compliance.

Your Application
Pharma AI Workflow
Reg writing, PV, clinical ops
Intelligence Layer
GxP Signal
Classify · Validate · Audit
Any Gateway
Portkey · Bifrost · Direct
Route, cache, fallback
LLM Provider
Claude · GPT · Gemini
Generate response

Five components, one compliance layer

Each built from pharma domain expertise that horizontal tools cannot replicate.

01

Pharma Task Classifier

Categorizes every AI request by pharma task type — regulatory writing, clinical summarization, pharmacovigilance, literature review, medical information — and assigns a regulatory risk tier. GxP-Critical tasks never get downgraded.

02

GxP Audit Engine

Generates 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 compatible audit records. Model ID, version, prompt hash, response hash, quality score, routing rationale — the format your QA team needs for inspections.

03

Domain Quality Validator

ICH guideline compliance, MedDRA terminology accuracy, CTD structural consistency, clinical claims screening, and citation verification. Quality gates generic tools will never build.

04

Risk-Stratified Routing Advisor

Recommends the optimal model tier based on regulatory risk. Enforces hard floors for GxP-critical tasks. Triggers fallback to premium when quality checks fail. Your gateway routes — we advise which route is safe.

05

Security Scanning

Prompt injection detection, PII/PHI scanning on both input and output. GxP-Critical requests are blocked on injection detect. Protects regulated workflows from data leakage and prompt manipulation.

Tested on 500 pharma prompts

Simulated across 7 task categories using realistic pharmaceutical AI workloads. Full audit trail, quality validation, and cost analysis on every request.

55%
Cost reduction via
risk-tiered routing
91.4%
Classification accuracy
across 7 categories
99%
Quality validation
pass rate
100%
Audit coverage with
SHA-256 integrity
← Scroll table →
Risk Tier % of Requests Before (all premium) After (GxP Signal) Savings
GxP-Critical 35% $2.79 $2.79 0% — quality floor
GxP-Adjacent 42% $3.38 $0.68 80%
Non-GxP 23% $1.77 $0.09 95%

Your content never leaves

GxP Signal processes content in-memory for classification and validation, then discards it. Only metadata and SHA-256 hashes are stored. The platform improves from aggregate patterns without ever seeing regulated content.

Prompt text is never stored. Only SHA-256 hashes retained for integrity verification.
Response text is never stored. Quality validation runs in-memory, then discards content.
SDK runs in your infrastructure. Content flows between your app and your LLM provider. GxP Signal never sees it.
Improves without seeing content. Classifier and quality rubrics refine from metadata patterns — never from prompt text.
GDPR-ready. Data processor model with DPA available. SOC 2 on the compliance roadmap.
Append-only database. Triggers prevent UPDATE and DELETE on audit records. Data integrity enforced at the database level.

Every AI decision,
fully traceable

When the inspector asks how your AI made a decision, GxP Signal provides the complete record — model version, prompt hash, quality validation, and routing rationale.

Designed for 21 CFR Part 11 and EU AI Act Article 12 traceability. Compatible with existing QMS workflows. Exports to CSV, PDF, and standard audit formats.

gxp-signal — audit record #2026-03-28-00147
timestamp
2026-03-28T14:32:07Z
task_classification
regulatory_writing → CMC_section
risk_tier
GxP-Critical
model_routed
claude-opus-4-6 (quality floor)
prompt_hash
sha256:a3f8c1…d92e
response_hash
sha256:7b2e04…f1a3
quality_score
0.94 — PASS
ich_compliance
Q3D referenced correctly
meddra_check
All terms valid (v27.1)
claims_flag
Hedging recommended §3.2.P.5
routing_rationale
GxP-Critical → premium enforced

Built by pharma.
Built for inspection day.

GxP Signal is in early access. If you're deploying AI in pharmaceutical development and need compliance you can defend, we should talk.

Kevin C. Edwards
M.S. Pharmaceutical Sciences · Former AD, Risk Management & Innovation, Merck · 20+ years in pharma manufacturing, product development, and regulatory science · 2 patents in pharmaceutical formulations