This is a mock excerpt from an NDA Module 2.5 Clinical Overview. Each highlighted sentence was AI-assisted during drafting. Click to see the complete evidence chain — exactly as a regulatory inspector would.
Submission: NDA 215432
Module: 2.5
Section: 2.5.4 Overview of Efficacy
Version: 3.2 Final
Generated: 2026-04-18

Clinical Overview — Overview of Efficacy

Drug Product: Olverastinib 50 mg film-coated tablets · Indication: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (second-line)

2.5.4.1 Pivotal Trial Summary

The pivotal Phase III trial, STUDY-401, was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating Olverastinib in patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 542 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Olverastinib 50 mg once daily (n=271) or placebo (n=271). The primary endpoint was achieved with a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.52–0.81, p<0.001) in the intent-to-treat populationi , representing a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in overall survival.

Evidence Chain — 5 sources GxP Audit #a3f8c1…d92e
data_table STUDY-401-TABLE-14.2.1.3
Primary Endpoint Results — Overall Survival (ITT Population)
CSR p. 847 · locked 2026-02-09
Locationveeva://vault/study-401/csr/14.2.1.3.pdf
Checksumsha256:9f3a2c8e…d92e7f01 ✓ verified
Locked2026-02-09 14:32 UTC
Page847
In production, this resolves to your document management system.
sap STUDY-401-SAP-v3.0 §5.4
Statistical Analysis Plan — primary endpoint hazard ratio derivation
Approved 2025-09-12
Locationveeva://vault/sap/study-401-sap-v3.0.pdf
Checksumsha256:b1d92e7f…5a4c1338 ✓ verified
Approved2025-09-12 09:15 UTC
Section5.4 (hazard ratio derivation)
In production, this resolves to your SAP repository.
guidance ICH E9 §5.5
Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials — intent-to-treat analysis
Locationhttps://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E9_Guideline.pdf
VersionICH E9 Step 4 (1998-02-05)
Retrieved2026-03-14 14:28 UTC
Section5.5 (intent-to-treat)
External regulatory guidance. Public URL preserved for audit.
quality Validation passed (0.96)
MedDRA v27.1 · Citation format · Claim substantiation
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/a3f8c1d92e/quality
Score0.96 / 1.00 ✓ passed
Validatorsmeddra v27.1, citation v2.1, claims v1.4
Run at2026-03-14 14:32:09 UTC
Quality results are immutable in the audit trail.
reviewer S. Chen, MD — approved 2026-03-15
Regulatory Medical Writer · modified citation format only
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/a3f8c1d92e/reviewers
E-signature21 CFR Part 11 §11.50/11.70 compliant ✓ compliant
Reviewed2026-03-15 10:24 UTC
ActionModified citation format (no content change)
Reviewer chain is append-only and signed.

Median overall survival was 14.8 months in the Olverastinib arm compared to 9.2 months for placeboi . The treatment effect was consistent across pre-specified subgroups including age, sex, ECOG performance status, and PD-L1 expression level.

Evidence Chain — 4 sources GxP Audit #b1d92e…5a4c
data_table STUDY-401-TABLE-14.2.1.4
Median OS by Treatment Arm — Kaplan-Meier estimates
CSR p. 851 · locked 2026-02-09
Locationveeva://vault/study-401/csr/14.2.1.4.pdf
Checksumsha256:c2e037a4…7b81f90d ✓ verified
Locked2026-02-09 14:32 UTC
Page851
In production, this resolves to your document management system.
data_table STUDY-401-FIGURE-14.2.1.5
Forest plot — Subgroup analysis of overall survival
CSR Appendix 16.4
Locationveeva://vault/study-401/csr/figures/14.2.1.5.pdf
Checksumsha256:d4f218c1…9c3a0e5b ✓ verified
Locked2026-02-09 14:32 UTC
ReferenceCSR Appendix 16.4
Figure source preserved with original generation parameters.
sap STUDY-401-SAP-v3.0 §6.2
Pre-specified subgroup analyses
Locationveeva://vault/sap/study-401-sap-v3.0.pdf
Checksumsha256:b1d92e7f…5a4c1338 ✓ verified
Approved2025-09-12 09:15 UTC
Section6.2 (subgroup analyses)
Pre-specified analyses tracked from SAP approval forward.
reviewer J. Williams, MD — approved 2026-03-18
Senior Medical Director · no changes
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/b1d92e5a4c/reviewers
E-signature21 CFR Part 11 §11.50/11.70 compliant ✓ compliant
Reviewed2026-03-18 16:08 UTC
ActionApproved without changes
Reviewer chain is append-only and signed.

2.5.4.2 Supporting Evidence

Findings from STUDY-401 are supported by data from a prior Phase II study (STUDY-203) and are consistent with the cross-trial efficacy observed in the recent ESMO 2025 published meta-analysis of EGFR-mutant NSCLC therapiesi . Together, these sources establish a coherent benefit profile for the proposed indication.

Evidence Chain — 3 sources GxP Audit #c2e037…7b81
prior_submission STUDY-203 CSR — Phase II
Olverastinib Phase II dose-finding study, EGFR-mutant cohort
Locationveeva://vault/study-203/csr/final.pdf
Checksumsha256:e7a3b918…1f024d77 ✓ verified
Locked2024-11-04 11:00 UTC
FilingPrior IND/Phase II completion package
Cross-submission references retain integrity verification.
literature PMID 39847212
Wang et al., 2025 — ESMO meta-analysis of EGFR-mutant NSCLC therapies
Locationhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39847212/
DOI10.1093/annonc/2025-meta-egfr
Retrieved2026-03-14 14:30 UTC
StatusActive citation, not retracted ✓ verified
Literature references checked against retraction databases.
quality Citation check passed
PubMed reference verified · no fabricated citations detected
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/c2e0377b81/citations
Citations1 verified, 0 fabricated, 0 retracted ✓ passed
Validatorcitation_check v2.1
Run at2026-03-14 14:32:11 UTC
Catches AI-fabricated citations before they reach a submission.

2.5.4.3 Benefit-Risk Assessment

The proposed dosing regimen of 50 mg once daily was selected based on the population pharmacokinetic exposure-response analysis described in Module 2.7.2, which demonstrated that exposures at this dose maximize the probability of achieving the target inhibitory concentration without exceeding the safety threshold established in the Phase I studyi .

Evidence Chain — 4 sources GxP Audit #d4f218…9c3a
prior_submission Module 2.7.2 — Summary of Clinical Pharmacology
Population PK exposure-response analysis (this submission)
Locationinternal://nda-215432/m272-clinical-pharm.pdf
Checksumsha256:f218c19c…3a0e5b22 ✓ verified
Versionv3.2 Final
Cross-refSame submission, Module 2.7.2
Internal cross-references checked for consistency across modules.
csr_section STUDY-101-CSR §11.4
Phase I dose-escalation safety threshold determination
Locationveeva://vault/study-101/csr/final.pdf
Checksumsha256:218c1924…0e5b2271 ✓ verified
Locked2023-08-22 09:45 UTC
Section11.4 (dose-escalation safety)
Phase I CSR retained with original integrity hash.
guidance FDA Guidance for Industry: Exposure-Response Relationships
2003 — supports dose selection methodology
Locationhttps://www.fda.gov/.../exposure-response-relationships
Version2003-04 Final
Retrieved2026-03-22 11:08 UTC
TypePublic regulatory guidance
External guidance retained with retrieval timestamp.
reviewer M. Patel, PharmD — approved 2026-03-22
Clinical Pharmacology Lead
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/d4f2189c3a/reviewers
E-signature21 CFR Part 11 §11.50/11.70 compliant ✓ compliant
Reviewed2026-03-22 14:55 UTC
ActionApproved with minor edits to dose justification language
Reviewer chain is append-only and signed.

Per ICH E2A, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse reactions (occurring in >10% of patients) were rash (32%), diarrhoea (28%), fatigue (24%), and pruritus (14%), all of which are coded to MedDRA v27.1 preferred termsi . The overall safety profile is consistent with the established class effect for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Evidence Chain — 4 sources GxP Audit #e7a3b9…1f02
data_table STUDY-401-TABLE-14.3.1.1
Treatment-emergent adverse events — All grades, by MedDRA PT
CSR p. 893
Locationveeva://vault/study-401/csr/14.3.1.1.pdf
Checksumsha256:7a3b9180…f024d771 ✓ verified
Locked2026-02-09 14:32 UTC
Page893
In production, this resolves to your document management system.
guidance ICH E2A
Clinical Safety Data Management — Definitions and Standards
Locationhttps://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2A_Guideline.pdf
VersionICH E2A Step 4 (1994-10-27)
Retrieved2026-03-25 09:14 UTC
ScopeClinical Safety Data Management
External regulatory guidance. Public URL preserved for audit.
quality MedDRA validation passed (4/4 PT verified)
Rash, Diarrhoea, Fatigue, Pruritus — all v27.1 preferred terms
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/e7a3b91f02/meddra
TermsRash, Diarrhoea, Fatigue, Pruritus ✓ all verified
DictionaryMedDRA v27.1 (March 2026)
Run at2026-03-25 09:14:47 UTC
MedDRA terminology checked against the active dictionary version.
reviewer L. Hayes, MD — approved 2026-03-25
Pharmacovigilance Lead
Audit refgxp-signal://audit/e7a3b91f02/reviewers
E-signature21 CFR Part 11 §11.50/11.70 compliant ✓ compliant
Reviewed2026-03-25 11:30 UTC
ActionApproved without changes
Reviewer chain is append-only and signed.